Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Disruption - interesting times

In the last week I have encountered a number of thought challenging, disruptive experiences and articles. Here's a couple of items that illustrate my point:

I have been exploring the changes that electronic medical records are creating. The process is being driven as part of the Administration's stimulus plan and their efforts to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care. The current approach has been summed up by on Twitter poster as: "... an endless barrage of information (and discussions and debates regarding various combinations of information)," Meanwhile CVS and Wallgreens are expanding into health care services though clinics in their stores and using the personal medical records systems of Google and Microsoft to improve service and communicate with the patient's doctor. Today there is word that the British national system is so over budget and late that they may adopt a Google or Microsoft solution. Are we seeing some classic Clayton Christionson disruptive technologies for health care? Microsoft and/or Google rather than a government driven program?

Here's an article from the July 2, 2009 issue of Business Week by Shoshana Zuboff who is regular contributor to Business Week. She points at some different but equally disruptive ideas.

I spent a quarter-century as a professor at the Harvard Business School, including 15 years teaching in the MBA program. I have come to believe that much of what my colleagues and I taught has caused real suffering, suppressed wealth creation, destabilized the world economy, and accelerated the demise of the 20th century capitalism in which the U.S. played the leading role.

We weren't stupid and we weren't evil. Nevertheless we managed to produce a generation of managers and business professionals that is deeply mistrusted and despised by a majority of people in our society and around the world. This is a terrible failure. ... Margins have shrunk steadily for 40 years; return on sales for the Fortune 500 has been declining since the early 1960s.

Many companies reacted to this decline by finding new ways to cut costs. The Harvard Business School, along with other business schools, taught them how: outsourcing, off-shoring, downsizing, reengineering, and finding new overseas markets for old products.

... a return to real prosperity and long-term growth ... will require a rebirth of business based on new rules for a new era.

The old rules that most B-schools have preached were invented a century ago for supplying mass consumers with affordable goods and services. They are poorly suited to the values of today's new consumers, who want help to live their lives as they choose, with personal control, voice, and a practical sense of connection. Many smart people have spent decades trying—and failing—to adapt the old model to this new pattern of consumer demand.

New Rule No. 1: Race to I-Space

The old rules assumed economic value. That's why Harvard Business School students have been trained for a century in the "administrative point of view." The manager's job was to oversee and control what was inside organization space, or what they were trained to view as "my company." Everything else was a distraction. The "administrative point of view" reflects a simpler time when business was about selling a product. .... It's a world of producers vs. consumers, my company vs. your company, us vs. them.

Business is no longer just about the product. Now it's about solutions for the individual. Economic value is hidden in consumers' unmet needs and is released by providing people with the means to fulfill those needs. But in order to release new value, you need to get out of organization space and into the subjective space where individuals live. I call it "I-Space." This means shedding the "us-them" mentality. Now everyone is an insider.

.... Apple headed for I-space with iPod/iTunes and released massive quantities of value by giving people what they wanted on their own terms in their own space. Meanwhile, music industry executives were busy throwing tantrums in organization space and suing their most passionate customers. ...

New Rule No. 2: Advocate, Don't Alienate

The old rules taught you to ask, "What is my product or service, and how can I sell it to you?" With that question, adversarialism was baked into the DNA of the buyer-seller transaction.

The new rules ask, "Who are you? What do you need? How can I help?" This creates a dynamic of advocacy and mutual accountability. The more trust you build, the more value you release, and the more wealth you create.

... President Barack Obama gets it. In his proposed overhaul of financial regulations, brokers will be compelled to put their clients' interests first. Trained in the administrative point of view, Wall Street executives are already preparing to fight the very changes that would put them on a path to new wealth creation.

New Rule No. 3: Collaborate and Federate to Compete

When you're in I-Space, you need to collaborate and federate to provide the support individuals need. You can't do it alone because the needs of individuals don't conform to existing organizational and industry boundaries. This means learning how to manage what you don't control or own. These economies of trust are becoming even more important than economies of scale.

... Amazon's marketplace and eBay's webs of buyers and sellers are early prototypes of these federated networks. Apple and Facebook are struggling to understand the rules of engagement that should govern relationships with their applications developers. You can see them climbing a new learning curve through trial and error as they figure out how to build and sustain economies of trust.

Are You Ready to Let Go?

After decades of working with adults on the challenges of transition, I know that letting go of the old rules won't be easy. No one gives up what they know without a fight. ...

Letting go is a Catch-22. You don't want to let go until you have something new to cling to, but you can't discover the new thing until you let go. In between, you must cross a mystery zone. Eventually you get to the point where you can't stand the feeling of things not adding up for one more minute. That's when you take a leap of faith, and the questions start to feel more important than the answers. You're in a new place. The bad news: There are no maps. The good news? You are the mapmaker.

Sounds like we are living in interesting times. Stay tuned.

Opportunities on the horizon

You cannot solve a problem on the same level that it was created.
You must rise above it to the next level.
Albert Einstein

There are opportunities on the horizon that can only be realized by rising to the next level of creativity and management. Some will be opportunities that expand the human experience; others will solve problems that threaten the quality of human existence. Some will stand on the shoulders of advancing technologies; others will be born of changes in the public reaction to environmental, economic and political issues. These are exciting and challenging times for those pursuing these opportunities.

The content of these opportunities is yet to be defined, but the processes to plan, develop, manage and implement solutions will be draw from the success of earlier creative projects. I have been there. Examples of successful first-of-their kind projects from my personal experience include:
• Participated in the design and management of the largest bank merger of its time including coordination of planning and reporting across geographically dispersed diverse organizations and integration of project communication.
• Explored a series of infrastructure changes for a client and found a combination that cost justified the evolution from physical to electronic distribution of time sensitive financial instruments and documents.
• Guided private sector implementation of Federal health care regulations as the regulations were being developed to assure compliance and minimize the time to realize benefits.
• Designed and managed the training for 1,800 rout salesmen and delivery drivers on the use of hand held computers that utilized street maps based on satellite imagery to improve service and reduce costs.
• Managed requirements analysis for Customs clearance of international airfreight for the first integrated air freight system; implemented at London Heathrow.
• Developed project plan for first online regional banking system in Asia and delivered executive and user training in eight countries.
• Created and managed communication strategy to build credibility for decentralization and outsourcing of critical infrastructure services; business units agreed to budget reductions of $100 million as a result of expected cost savings.

If you are working on a significant new opportunity or considering one, I would be interested in discussing ways we may be able to work together on the processes to plan the project and manage it to a successful conclusion.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Communication Guidelines

This set of communication guidelines was originally prepared to assist members of a project team prepare project documentation. It is intentionally informal and open for comment and refinement.

Requirements Analysis in 3 pages - 2 of them graphics

What started as one of the most challenging “reports” I every “wrote” turned out to be one of the most rewarding in terms of telling a story.

The project was a requirements analysis for a Japanese automobile company with sales and manufacturing facilities here in the US. It covered the flow of data and parts across four countries and three divisions. The assignment specified that the final report would be no more than three 11”x17 pages. One as-is flowchart, one to-be flowchart and one for text about the problem, scope, assumptions, alternatives, etc.

My assumption that the graphics were a way to bridge language barriers was partly true. More important, it was a way to force clarity about the present processes and the requirements for the future system. If two or three small graphics, an arrow or two and a very brief label weren’t clear to my readers then I wasn’t as clear as I needed to be about a particular step.

Received high marks from the client for the story. They loved the outcome since I proved that the best solution was a change in procedures rather than a new system. Rewarding in terms of telling a story and delivering value to the client, but not in terms of follow on.

Proposal for Requirements Analysis - Powerpoint

Presentation to a group of doctors contemplating development of a hospital system to improve patient care and reduce the risk of litigation.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Reducing the Risks of Complexity

With the checklist in hand, the pilots went on to fly the Model 299 a total of 1.8 million miles without one accident. The Army ultimately ordered almost thirteen thousand of the aircraft, which it dubbed the B-17. And, because flying the behemoth was now possible, the Army gained a decisive air advantage in the Second World War which enabled its devastating bombing campaign across Nazi Germany.


That's a story from 1935 and the birth of checklists as a way to reduce the risks of complexity. The heart of the original article is about applying a lesson from 1935 to Intensive Care Units today. I read the article as an endorsement for the wider use of checklists as a tool to deal with the complexities of information technology, but that's my bias. I also read it as an amazingly simple way to reduce the risks and costs of modern medicine.
______

In December, 2006, the results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine. Within the first three months of the project, the infection rate in Michigan's ICUs decreased by sixty-six per cent. The typical ICU cut its quarterly infection rate to zero. Michigan's infection rates fell so low that its average ICU outperformed ninety per cent of ICUs nationwide. In the first eighteen months, the hospitals saved an estimated hundred and seventy-five million dollars in costs and more than fifteen hundred lives. The successes have been sustained for almost four years-all because of a stupid little checklist.

Original article
posted December 2007

Photographs: Getty 1.0 Annenberg 2.0

Last Sunday The Annenberg Space for Photography. This Sunday, the photography exhibit at The Getty. What a conrast, not bad, just very different. Differences of that order are often referred to on the Internet as Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 -- here: Museum 1.0 and 2.0.

1.0 Getty featured two photographers
2.0 Annenberg showcased eight photographers

1.0 Photography was just a small part of a very large museum
2.0 A single integrated exhibit in a much smaller place

1.0 The space (museum) was a major part of the experience
2.0 The space facilitated the experience and then disappeared

1.0 The photos were hung on walls with labels and descriptions
2.0 The photos were hung on frames and walls and presented in a video and other electronic media

1.0 There were self portraits of the artists and panels about them and their work
2.0 There was a video of them commenting on their photos

1.0 The science of photography
2.0 The art of photography

1,0 I was educated
2,0 I was moved

1.0 The photos captured life
2.0 The photos expressed life

1.0 The photos were now separate from life
2.0 The photos provided a new perspective that drew me back to life

1,0 I learned something about photography
2.0 I learned something about myself

1.0 I learned
2.0 I reacted with joy, celebration, surprise, concern, rejection

1.0 I left with ideas
2.0 I left with conversations

I enjoyed the Getty and am pleased that I went. I will go back to see future exhibits.

I was moved by the Annenberg and can't wait until their new exhibit opens July 11. I am sure I will want to see it several times and will take friends.

Posted Sunday, July5, 2009